MATH 100 limits practice
A limit describes where a function is heading as its input approaches some value, which is not always where the function arrives, and sometimes the function never arrives at all. Almost everything that follows in MATH 100 is defined in terms of one, so the fluency you build here is spent for the rest of the term.
Most limit questions on a first-term paper fall into four shapes: substitution works immediately, substitution gives 0/0 and the expression needs rewriting, the two sides disagree, or the variable runs off to infinity. Recognising which shape you are looking at is most of the work; the algebra afterwards is usually short.
The questions below cover all four, from a factor-and-cancel warm-up to a bounded factor trapped against zero and a limit with an unknown constant.
In this topic
- Taught
- Before the midterm
- Questions
- 30
- Total marks
- 73
- Suggested time
- 120 min
- Difficulty
Introductory to Capstone
Show the 9 hardest
Key results
- One-sided limits
- Limit laws
When and both exist as real numbers, and for the quotient .
- Nonzero over zero
With near ; the sign of on each side decides or , the two-sided limit is infinite only when both sides agree, and as well is the form , which needs rewriting first.
- The squeeze theorem
When the inequalities hold for every near , except possibly at itself; the same holds as when they hold for all large .
- The sine limit
With in radians.
- Limits at infinity
For any positive integer ; the last holds for every , so when .
Read the theoryUBC Math 100 §2.1 Quick review of limitsUBC Math 100 §2.1.1 Calculating limits with limit lawsUBC Math 100 §2.1.2 Limits at infinityUBC Math 100 §2.2 AsymptotesCLP-1 §1.3 The limit of a functionCLP-1 §1.4 Calculating limits with limit lawsCLP-1 §1.5 Limits at infinity
Worked example
Evaluate the limit.
Strategy
The indeterminate form comes from a difference of square roots. Multiplying by the conjugate turns that difference into a difference of squares, which cancels the troublesome factor.
Working
Substitution gives 0/0, so the expression has to be rewritten before the limit can be read off.
Multiply by the conjugate over itself. This is multiplication by 1, so the value is unchanged.
The numerator collapses by the difference-of-squares identity. Leave the denominator factored.
Cancel the shared factor of x. The indeterminate form is gone.
Substitute x = 0 into the continuous expression that remains.
Answer
The answer is 1/4, or 0.25.
Check
At x = 0.01 the quotient is (√4.01 − 2)/0.01 ≈ 0.2498, close to 1/4.
Where this goes wrong
Expanding the root term by term as √x + √4 and cancelling. The square root of a sum is not the sum of the square roots, so that step is not algebra you can do.
On the paper
Say what substitution gives, or a nonzero number over , before you rewrite. Keep on every line until the last substitution, and give the sign from each side for an infinite limit.
Leans on
Rationalising with a conjugate, from Functions, graphs and inverses
What you should be able to do
Decide whether substitution is enough
For a function continuous at the point, the limit is just the value. Knowing when you are allowed to stop there saves time you will want later in the paper.
Resolve the indeterminate form 0/0
Factor and cancel, multiply by a conjugate, or combine fractions over a common denominator. Each technique targets a different reason the zero appeared.
Work with one-sided limits
Evaluate from the left and the right separately, and state that the two-sided limit exists only when they agree. Piecewise functions and vertical asymptotes both depend on this.
Handle limits at infinity
Divide the top and the bottom by the highest power of in the denominator and let every reciprocal term vanish. Under a square root, , which is as . For rational functions this reduces to comparing leading terms, sign included.
Trap a bounded factor
A factor such as oscillates without settling, but it stays between −1 and 1. Multiply that bound by a factor that tends to zero and is never negative, such as or , and the product is trapped between two quantities that both tend to zero.
State continuity in terms of limits
A function is continuous at a point when the limit exists, the value exists, and the two are equal. Questions asking you to choose a constant are testing exactly this definition.
Where marks are usually lost
Reading 0/0 as “the limit does not exist”
An indeterminate form is a signal that the expression has not been simplified, not a verdict. The expression is undefined at the point; the limit near it may still be an ordinary number.
Splitting a root across a sum
The square root of a sum is not the sum of the square roots. When a root is causing the trouble, the tool is the conjugate, not distribution.
Losing a sign in a limit at infinity
In an expression such as the leading coefficient of the denominator is −2, not 2. Rewriting the denominator in descending order before comparing prevents this.
Applying when the arguments do not match
The standard limit equals 1 only when the argument of the sine and the denominator are identical and tend to 0. For the answer is , reached by forcing the match first.
Answering an unsigned infinity at a vertical asymptote
When the two sides run to and the two-sided limit does not exist, and the marks are for saying which side does which. A single unsigned answer cannot be right.
Practice questions
5 of the 30, across every level. Open a solution to read the working, or answer the question yourself and it counts towards your progress.
- Introductory1 mark · 2 min
Evaluate the limit.
Answer this questionStrategy
Direct substitution gives 0/0, an indeterminate form. That means the numerator and denominator share a factor. Cancel it, then substitute.
Working
Factor the numerator as a difference of squares. The shared factor is now visible.
Cancel. This is valid because a limit only cares about x near 3, never x equal to 3.
The simplified function is continuous, so substitute.
Answer
The answer is 6.
Check
At x = 3.01 the quotient is 0.0601/0.01 = 6.01, close to 6.
Where this goes wrong
Reading 0/0 as “undefined” and concluding the limit does not exist. An indeterminate form means the algebra is not finished; the function is genuinely undefined at x = 3, but the limit as x approaches 3 still exists.
Leans on
Factoring polynomials, from Functions, graphs and inverses
Try a similar question
Evaluate the limit. - Introductory2 marks · 3 min
The function is defined piecewise below. Which statement about its behaviour at is true?
Answer this questionStrategy
Evaluate each one-sided limit from the piece that applies on that side. The two-sided limit exists only if they agree; the value f(1) is irrelevant to whether it does.
Working
From the left, x < 1, so the first piece applies.
From the right, x > 1, so the third piece applies.
The one-sided limits disagree. f(1) = 3 does not change that.
Answer
The answer is the left-hand limit is 2, the right-hand limit is 3, and the two-sided limit does not exist.
Check
f(0.99) = 1.9801 and f(1.01) = 2.99, so the values head for 2 from the left and 3 from the right.
Where this goes wrong
Reading the limit off the middle line: f(1) = 3 is the value of the function at 1, and a limit is about the values nearby, not the value there.
Leans on
Evaluating a piecewise function, from Functions, graphs and inverses
- Standard2 marks · 4 min
Evaluate the limit.
Answer this questionStrategy
For a rational function as x grows without bound, divide numerator and denominator by the highest power of x present. Every lower-order term then vanishes.
Working
Divide every term above and below by x². Nothing is lost; this is one fraction rewritten.
Each remaining reciprocal term shrinks to zero as x grows.
What survives is the ratio of the leading coefficients, sign included.
Answer
The answer is −3/2, or −1.5.
Check
At x = 1000 the quotient is 2,995,001/(−1,999,993) ≈ −1.4975, negative and close to −1.5.
Where this goes wrong
Reporting 3/2 and losing the sign, because the denominator is written as 7 − 2x² rather than −2x² + 7. The leading coefficient of the denominator is −2.
Leans on
Behaviour of 1/x as x grows, from Functions, graphs and inverses
- Challenging3 marks · 5 min
Evaluate the limit.
Answer this questionStrategy
Divide top and bottom by the dominant power, x. The only subtlety is pulling x inside a square root when x is negative: √(x²) = |x| = −x there, which flips a sign.
Working
Divide numerator and denominator by x.
For negative x, x = −√(x²). This is where the sign comes from.
The reciprocal terms vanish; the root tends to 3.
Answer
The answer is negative one half.
Check
At x = −100 the top is −197 and the bottom √90,001 + 100 ≈ 400, so the quotient is about −0.49, close to −1/2.
Where this goes wrong
Writing √(9x²+1)/x → +3 and getting 2/(3 − 1) = 1. As x → −∞ the square root is positive but x is negative, so the ratio tends to −3.
Leans on
Square roots and absolute value, from Functions, graphs and inverses
Try a similar question
Evaluate the limit. - Capstone5 marks · 9 min
For exactly one pair of constants and , the limit below exists and equals 2. Find and , and enter .
Answer this questionStrategy
Two conditions fix two constants. The limit is finite only if bx cancels the growth of the root, which fixes b; then the conjugate turns the ∞ − ∞ form into a quotient whose limit, set equal to 2, fixes a. Both steps turn on the sign of √(x²) for negative x.
Working
For negative x, √(x²) = |x| = −x.
The bracket tends to b − 6 while x → −∞, so the expression is unbounded unless b = 6.
Multiply and divide by the conjugate; the x² terms cancel.
Use the same −x for the root in the denominator, then divide the top and the bottom by x.
Set the limit equal to 2.
Answer
The answer is a is negative 24 and b is 6, so a plus b is negative 18.
Check
With a = −24 and b = 6, at x = −1000 the expression is √36,024,005 − 6000 ≈ 2.00008, close to 2.
Where this goes wrong
Writing √(36x²) = 6x. For negative x it is −6x, so the b that cancels the growth is 6, not −6, and the same sign decides the denominator after the conjugate. With the sign wrong in both places the working gives b = −6 and a = 24, a pair for which the expression tends to +∞.
Leans on
Square roots and absolute value, from Functions, graphs and inverses
Try a similar question
Evaluate the limit.
Common questions
- Do I need to use the epsilon-delta definition in MATH 100?
- Rarely. Questions ask you to evaluate limits and reason about one-sided and infinite behaviour; a formal epsilon-delta proof is not the usual expectation in a first course.
- When can I use L’Hôpital’s rule?
- Practise limits by algebra first: factor, rationalise, or divide by the highest power, because a question can ask for a limit without the rule. The rule itself applies only to the forms 0/0 and infinity over infinity, and only when the limit of the quotient of the derivatives exists or is infinite; any other indeterminate form has to be rewritten as one of these first.
- How much working should I show for a limit question?
- Enough that each step follows from the one above. Naming the indeterminate form, showing the rewrite that removes it, and then substituting is normally the full expectation for a two or three mark question.
Related topics
Needs
Functions, graphs and inverses
Domain, composition, transformations, inverses and the trigonometry the course assumes.
19 questions
Leads to
The definition of the derivative
Secants and tangents, average and instantaneous velocity, the difference quotient and differentiability.
27 questions
29 questions