- Difficulty
- Challenging
- Suggested time
- 6 min
- Marks
- 3
The definition of the derivative practice question 24
Two students use the definition of the derivative to find for , as shown. Which solution is right, and why?
Lines A1 and B1 are the same, so compare A2 with B2. Do they describe the same quotient?
Factor out of the bottom of B2. With still a factor of both the top and the bottom, what does at actually tell you?
Theory UBC Math 100 §3.3CLP-1 §2.2Key results
Worked solution
Strategy
Check each line against the definition. Both solutions set up the quotient and multiply by the conjugate correctly; they differ in what they do with the factor h.
Working
A1 and B1 are right: x is replaced by 5 + h everywhere.
Multiplying by the conjugate clears the root from the top. A2 and B2 both reach this quotient; B has multiplied out the bottom.
The bottom of B2 still has the factor h. Cancel it, as A2 does; h is never 0 in the limit, so this is allowed.
Now h = 0 can be put in, as in A3. B3 put it in one step too early and read the resulting 0/0 as “does not exist”.
Answer
The answer is A is right: f prime of 5 is 3/8. B set h = 0 before cancelling h..
Check
At h = 0.01 the quotient (√16.03 − 4)/0.01 is about 0.3748, close to 3/8 = 0.375, so the limit exists.
Where this goes wrong
Reading 0/0 at h = 0 as “no derivative”. In a difference quotient the top and the bottom always both tend to 0; the factor h has to cancel before h = 0 can be put in.
Leans on
Rationalising with the conjugate, from Limits
Saved in this browser only.