- Topic
- Linear approximation
- Difficulty
- Challenging
- Suggested time
- 6 min
- Marks
- 3
Linear approximation practice question 11
A drug’s effect at concentration (in mg/L), as a fraction of its greatest possible effect, is modelled by . The tangent line at gives the estimate . Which statement is correct?
Over or under depends on which side of its tangent line the graph lies, and that is decided by concavity: find the sign of between 1 and 1.2.
. Differentiate again with the quotient rule, using the chain rule on the denominator.
Theory UBC Math 100 §9.2CLP-1 §3.4Key results
Worked solution
Strategy
Whether the graph lies above or below its tangent line is a question about bending, so it is settled by the sign of the second derivative on the step from 1 to 1.2, not by the first derivative.
Working
Quotient rule; the c³ terms cancel.
Quotient rule again, then cancel one factor of 1 + c².
So E is concave down on the whole step from 1 to 1.2, not just at 1.
A concave-down graph lies below its tangent lines, so the estimate is too high, as the true value confirms.
Answer
The answer is An overestimate, because E is concave down near c = 1..
Check
At c = 1.1 too, E = 1.21/2.21 ≈ 0.548 is below the tangent line’s 0.55, so the curve sits under its tangent there.
Where this goes wrong
Reading the picture the wrong way round. A concave-down graph bends away below its tangent line, so a tangent-line estimate is too high; concave up, too low.
Leans on
Concavity from the second derivative, from Curve sketching
Saved in this browser only.