- Topic
- Limits
- Difficulty
- Challenging
- Suggested time
- 5 min
- Marks
- 3
Limits practice question 25
Which statement about the vertical asymptotes of the graph of the function below is correct?
A vertical asymptote needs to grow without bound, not merely a zero in the denominator. Which values of are worth checking for this ?
At both the numerator and the denominator are 0. Multiply the top and the bottom by the conjugate .
After the conjugate, the bottom becomes and cancels. Substitute into what is left, then check the value at , where the domain begins.
Theory UBC Math 100 §2.2CLP-1 §1.4Key results
Worked solution
Strategy
A zero of the denominator gives an asymptote only if the quotient blows up there. At x = 2 the numerator vanishes too, so rationalise the denominator and see what is left. Check the edge of the domain as well.
Working
Both parts vanish at 2: a 0/0 form, not yet a verdict.
Multiply the top and the bottom by the conjugate; the bottom becomes x − 2.
Cancel x − 2. The limit is finite, so x = 2 is a hole, not an asymptote.
Where the domain begins, g has a finite value, so x = −7 is no asymptote either.
Answer
The answer is there is no vertical asymptote; the graph has a hole at x = 2, where g approaches 24.
Check
g(1.99) ≈ 23.93 and g(2.01) ≈ 24.07, so g settles near 24 instead of blowing up.
Where this goes wrong
Calling every zero of the denominator a vertical asymptote. When the numerator is 0 there too, cancel first: here the quotient tends to 24, so the graph has a hole.
Leans on
Rationalising with a conjugate, from Functions, graphs and inverses
Saved in this browser only.